Jive Talks

6 Posts tagged with the community tag

Ever wish you could find someone working on social media or Enterprise 2.0 efforts at other companies, same as you? Wish you could pick their brain about how the heck they justified the implementation cost? Found that elusive ROI? Tricks to get employees to use it? Best way to communicate your new online community to your brand fanbase?

 

Ever wish you could do this without all of we pesky software vendors trying to market to you the whole time?

 

Well, now you can.

 

Jive Software (your favorite pesky software vendor) is proud to announce the new Clearstep business community (register today - it's free!).

 

There's already quite a bit of activity in Clearstep. It's segmented into two areas:

 

 

ClearstepOnline.png

 

Online Communities

Build, manage, and measure your community successfully

 

Social media folks focused on external-facing communities will be most interested in these discussions, tips and tricks. Current hot topics include (requires registration):

 

  Engagement with Social Media: Personal vs. Business purposes?

Why Most Online Communities Fail

Recommendations for human moderation vendor?

What are community metrics that you measure?

 

 

 

ClearstepInternal.png

 

Internal Collaboration

Discover best practices in leveraging enterprise social software

 

Enterprise 2.0 advocates focused on internal social networking and collaboration will be most interested in this area. Current hot topics include:

 

Do reputation points help or hurt?

What's your Governance Model Look Like?

Enterprise 2.0 Use Cases

How do you select your pilot groups?

 

Want to know the best part about this community? It is completely vendor-agnostic. That's right. There are folks discussing solutions from Microsoft, Jive (obviously), IBM, Atlassian, etc. The community managers are absolutely committed to keeping this place vendor-agnostic and marketing-free so that the truly valuable conversations can be had.

 

And last I checked, the majority of participants work at very recognizable Fortune 500 companies.

 

Makes you wonder if the old customer reference requests are a thing of the past. You can now just participate in Clearstep, and ask your peers yourself.

 

Register today!

0 Comments Permalink

Did you know that you can get a free license of Clearspace X if you are a non-commercial open source project or developer group? This is one of the cool parts of my of my job … I get to give people free software licenses!

 

Our Clearspace X product just won the Best Community Platform award from InfoWorld, so we're giving you some great community software! You can read the full review on the InfoWorld site. This award is no surprise to me. We power the 2 communities that I manage, Jivespace and Ignite Realtime, on Clearspace X.

 

 

One group taking advantage of this free license program is the Open Management Consortium.  Last week, they just released a beta version of their new site based entirely on Clearspace X. They managed to get the entire site up and running with the old data moved into the new site mostly over a weekend. The OMC was formed with the goal being to "advance the promotion, adoption, development and integration of open source systems /network management software." They are using Clearspace X to power the community where the members of this group collaborate, discuss ideas, and get organized about how to accomplish this goal.

 

If you have an open source project or a developer group (users group, etc.) and want to take advantage of the free licenses, you can find more details and a short request form on the free license page on Jivespace.

0 Comments Permalink

Last week in part 2 of the Extended Enterprise series, I blogged about the value that external communities offer to the internal business community. Now, I'd like to share some strategy for how to grow the kind of community that delivers on that value. In our sister market, CRM, the post  on SearchCIO.com had this to say: "Last June Cambridge, Mass.-based Forrester Research Inc. reported that less than 50% of the 94 business and IT executives it surveyed were fully satisfied with their CRM deployments. When Forrester asked those executives to list their best practices for improving their CRM implementation, 66% said promoting user adoption was a top priority." The user adoption challenge for CRM is similar to the user adoption challenge when implementing social productivity software in the enterprise. If you want a community (internal or external) where social productivity can be optimized, you need to put quite a bit of thought into how the community will be structured. In addition to productivity concerns, this initial structure can also impact the adoption of your new community. The challenges include how much or how little structure should be provided and then what kind of promotion/coaching/training should follow the initial implementation. The amount of structure falls into three main categories: emergent, highly structured, and adaptive.

 

Emergent

An emergent approach presents the community members with a blank slate with no defined sub-communities, topics, or other structure. As the topics of conversation evolve into common threads, gradually a structure is put in place.  For example, if there are many discussions about best practices, then maybe it makes sense to add a best practices area within the community.

 

Using an emergent structure when building a community has a number of advantages. It is easy to implement, since less up-front planning is required to define the structure. You get great user buy-in when the users are helping to define the structure.  The end result may include a fantastic structure that you never would have thought of as way to organize your community.

 

There are also a few disadvantages associated with the emergent approach. The biggest disadvantage is that many users will be faced with writers block. It can be much easier to contribute to a community when faced with some general topics, instead of a blank slate.  Another issue is that contributors can get sidetracked more easily. If the first few posts are way off topic, the rest may continue in that thread making it difficult to achieve the objectives that the enterprise is trying to accomplish. It can also be difficult to establish structure after people have started contributing, since many discussion threads, documents or other content will need to be moved into the new structure.

 

I think that the emergent approach would work best in environments where the subjects are not clear or are still emerging. It also works well for non-enterprise (purely social) communities where the community is self-led.

 

Highly Structured

In the highly structured approach, the community manager lays out a very formal and possibly rigid structure before rolling out the community. Community contributions will need to fit within this defined structure.

 

The highly structured approach has some advantages. The enterprise has much more control over the topics allowed within the community. The expectations for community members are also clear.  When community members arrive at the community, they see the topical areas where they can contribute.

 

The disadvantages of this approach are that it can be restrictive and possibly inflexible as the market changes and evolves. You may miss valuable contributions in areas that you never thought to include, but that would have great benefit for the community. The structure may be defined in a way that just doesn't work in the real world.  Some community members may also resist the structure if it doesn't fit with the topics that are important to the community or if the structure makes it difficult to figure out where to post content.

 

This approach works best when a company wants to have very tight control over their community; however, this control usually comes at the expense of community buy-in and participation.

 

Adaptive

An adaptive approach requires that you define some structure before the community launches, but allows for additional changes as the community evolves. A few top level topics may be defined while sub-topics and additional top level topics are encouraged to emerge.

 

Advantages of an adaptive structure include stronger user buy-in as they see the structure evolve in response to community input. The company still has some control over the topics and the initial direction of the community.  The community can evolve in directions not anticipated during the initial design.

 

The disadvantages of this approach are minor.  The company gives up a little control to the community. User traction is required to make progress toward the defining the rest of the structure.

 

Tips and Recommendations

I recommend using the adaptive approach when starting your community. This has worked well for me in the past, particularly with the Ignite Realtime community. We started with a loose structure in place, but over the past six months, I have made quite a few changes in response to community requests and the evolution of the community. With Jivespace, I took a much more structured approach, not out of a desire to control it, but because I got a little carried away with defining things up front.  As a result, I have some sub-communities that are rarely used. I find the adaptive approach more appealing.  I can define a few sub-communities until I see where people are contributing.  In general, it is easier to add new communities over time as needed.

 

Over a longer period of time, most communities will need to be adaptive. Businesses and products change and evolve as markets and technologies change. Communities need to have some flexibility to adapt and grow to include new areas of collaboration.

 

Spend some time in the early days of the community identifying and getting to know the heavy users and tap them for spreading interest within the community.  These community members can give you an early indication of where the community is headed and how you might need to adapt the structure. They can also be your biggest allies when you need help with problem users, disagreements within the community, and even just answering routine questions.  Jim McGee summarizes this well in The Problem of Emergence post on FASTForward the blog:

"In particular, the plan needs to identify those potential users who are most likely to benefit from the new capabilities and whose successful use of the technology will be interpreted as an endorsement to be emulated."

 

0 Comments Permalink

In the first part of this series, Chris elaborated on a number of categories that represent the kind of framework we're using to connect Clearspace and CSX. This helps us visualize how the whole company can become better integrated with not just customers and partners, but also other industry thought leaders. In the short term these connections may be light, but we can see it maturing into something really powerful that speaks to the true value of Social Productivity.

In the second part of this series, I will elaborate on how these six areas can map to several scenarios for connecting people inside and outside of an organization allowing businesses to become more productive. Let me point out that the mapping is not an easy 1:1 between each internal company function and your external community.  Would you want to participate in a sales or marketing community for a company so that they could sell you stuff or market to you? Probably not. However, as a satisfied customer, you might talk about a company's products to other community members (sounds like something sales and marketing types might want to see)!

 

Products and Services

Product management has always been listening to customers and engaging with them to determine product requirements and get feedback that drives product development, but we shouldn't stop with product management.  Wouldn't it be great if your engineering or development team could see the feedback directly and ask questions to get clarification to make sure they are satisfying the customer with the technical solution? Social productivity tools, like Clearspace, just make it easier to gather input from your customers in an interactive, collaborative environment. In a community setting, your customers can have an open exchange with your employees about new feature requests, ideas, issues with existing functionality and more.  By having this discussion in an open, social setting, we can have honest and ongoing discussions with our customers and use it to more productively set product development roadmaps and drive product decisions. These types of feature discussions have helped Jive engineers and product managers engage productively with our external community.

 

This is also a perfect place to step in with solutions and services to allow customers to embrace the solution and help them solve the issues that come up when talking about product requirements and feature requests. Some individual customers will always need a particular feature that cannot be provided in the product. By having development, product management, and services all involved in the community, your company can make better decisions about which requests should be in the product and which ones can be more quickly provided by the services group.

 

According to Jeremiah Owyang:

The opportunity to build better products and services through this real-time live focus group are ripe, in many cases, customer communities have been waiting for a chance to give feedback.

 

Robert Scoble also touched on the value an external community has to product marketing, development, and services in an interview he did with Search CIO, stating:

 

>We used blog-search engines to find anyone who wrote the word "Microsoft" on their blog. Even if they had no readers and were just ranting, "I hate Microsoft," I could see that and link to it, or I could participate in their comments, or send them an e-mail saying, "What's going on?" And that told those people that someone was listening to their rants, that this is a different world than the one in which no one listens. It was an invaluable focus group that Microsoft didn't have to pay for.

 

In the future business landscape, connecting customer feedback within the organization may not be a competitive advantage, it may be a requirement. Claudio Marcus and Kimberly Collins of Gartner quantified the advantage in the B2C market in an interview for Influence 2.0 as such:

 

>...by 2007, marketers that devote at least 50% of their time to advanced customer-centric marketing processes and capabilities will achieve marketing return on investment that is at least 30 percent greater than that of their peers, who lack such emphasis

 

Support

Support organizations can also benefit from social productivity software while supporting customers. When customers and support staff can collaborate in an online environment, both groups get value out of the exchange. Not only can customers search the site to get answers before engaging support, but they can also help troubleshoot issues and provide advice to other customers. Since you are also in the community along with the customers you can quickly correct any misinformation while reinforcing accurate information. In some cases, your customers will come up with solutions, workarounds, and ideas that your internal team would never have considered without this external source of collaboration.

 

The tech industry has known about the value of a support community for some time. Forums have long been the tool of choice for facilitating such a community. However, as Chris pointed out in the first post of this series, "...traditional Communities (like forums) fall short because they are basically dependent on people in the enterprise getting onto the external community to participate." A common platform that extends on both sides of the firewall, such as Clearspace, bridges the chasm between the external and internal, which is what it takes to deliver on the support community value proposition.

 

Evangelism and Reputation Management

These helpful customers mentioned above who proactively help other customers, can also become evangelists for your products. I've seen these enthusiastic community members step up and speak out on behalf of a company when other community members are being unfairly critical. In fact, John points out an example of a Dell customer that has posted and helped 20,452 times since 1999.  A response to criticism that might seem defensive when coming from an employee may be seen as more genuine when coming from a customer. Marketing groups should be courting and talking to these community members and do what it takes to keep them happy. Engaging in this social and open collaboration between internal employees and external users also gives sales and marketing a place to provide information about products and best practices / thought leadership for your industry to keep the customers energized. Managing your reputation also becomes much easier when you can provide information and collaborate in a socially productive environment.

 

I wanted to start here to lay the foundation for how external communities bring value into the organization. Next week I'll share some strategies for how to grow and shape your external community so that it accomplishes the value I described in this post.

 

I'll leave you with a quote from Anne Zelenka at GigaOM:

 

If the promises of social productivity tools prove out, companies deploying them should see improved customer responsiveness, more successful products, more enthusiastic user communities, and better financial results.

 

1 Comments Permalink

Social productivity is all about getting stuff done through visibility, influence and  engaging those people that you do not normally work with everyday. As work is introduced, stakeholders from diverse backgrounds and experiences can chime in to provide valuable insight and move the work efficiently along. These could be people you know within the company, people retained by your company, customers, or partners working outside of your company. Connecting people within your firewall has a host of challenges. Connecting people outside your firewall to those inside of it can be downright daunting. But, what if you could unlock the bottleneck and connect the external community activity in intelligent ways to the same activity inside of the enterprise? When I can reach out to engage with customers to make important product decisions I need relevant customer comments to find their way to me without me looking for them.  It would be great if "approved" thinking from the inside the company could be exposed to customers who might find it interesting or helpful.  When these things happen that's when I realize the benefits of social productivity.

 

The epiphany here is that traditional Communities (like forums) fall short because they are basically dependent on people in the enterprise getting onto the external community to participate. The sad reality is that in most companies' communities are "owned" by one person in one department--sometimes they even have a specified title like "Community Manager". In most companies that means one of two things: 1) There is a community manager trying to beg people in the company to get involved in the community, or 2) Enterprising employees who see the value have to get into the community just like a customer and then sift through everything to find out what is going on. It's a lot of overhead and a lot of work with only a little value if you're casually engaged.

 

With this on my mind I stumbled across a blog post that John Eckman of Open Parenthesis did about a month ago on Josh Bernoff's keynote from the Forrester Consumer Forum. John raises some interesting points about buzz & technology being short lived and the imperative to solve real problems, but the part that caught my eye were his objectives regarding

the Community aspect of the equation.

 

I "added some value" to (shamelessly modified) his thoughts by swapping some categories and adding some of my own. I saw the external community engagements relating to the internal functions like this:

 

 

The value proposition for connecting external community within the enterprise

John provided examples, which are:

Function

Engagement

Value Example

Marketing

Talking

Adidas drives 4 million impressions with their soccer page on MySpace and it cost them $100K.

Sales

Energizing

How eBags energized their sales with rating and reviews. Empowering customers and turning them into evangelists to recruit other customers and catalyze sales.

Support

Supporting

Dell has a user who has posted and helped 20,452 times since 1999. The only thing I think is cooler is connecting this straight into the official support org.

Services

Embracing

I thought his example here was better for "Satisfying". In my mind, Services plays a leadership role in enabling our customers to embrace the solution. They are solution leaders, and help fit square pegs into round holes.

Product Mgmt

Listening

Gives the example of Salesforce.com and the idea of working with customers to create and prioritize features/products. I use this example all the time in speaking with people.

Development

Satisfying

I think giving Development direct access to see what customers are talking about and the problems they are having is the best way to create a great product. Let's face it no one understands how the products really work better than development, and there are no better people to create something that truly satisfies customer's needs.

 

These categories aren't new or revolutionary, but I think they represent a the kind of framework we're using to connect Clearspaceand CSX. It starts painting a story of the whole company being integrated with its customers and partners, not just the "community manager". In the short term these connections may be light, but I can see it maturing into something really powerful that speaks to the true value of Social Productivity. Within each of these functions there are really 3 meaningful forms of interaction in the short term:

  • See content from the outside

  • Share content from the inside

  • Engage the right people in the community for feedback

 

If you believe like we do that when we succeed in connecting internal and external communities on a common information exchange platform then we can realize social productivity, then watch for the next two posts in this series:

  • Tactics for connecting outside communities with internal functions

  • Organizational strategies for growing communities that support your goals

 

Permalink

<span style="padding: 10px; float: right">

</span>Today, Intel launched Open Port, Intel's "first public online community," a site dedicated to direct communication between Intel's product & technology experts and the IT community. The video below does a better job than we could in explaining what the community is all about.  One of the many quotes I liked was

 

"To talk to your end user is a must. The longer it takes to make that connection the more you become disconnected from your end user and what they need and want."

 

Intel shows the right leadership in welcoming a myriad of views and opinions as well as their plan to engage deeply with their community. The site officially launches next week. Be sure to check it out!

0 Comments Permalink

Actions